{"id":9791,"date":"2015-04-14T12:30:07","date_gmt":"2015-04-14T16:30:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/collation.folger.edu\/?p=9791"},"modified":"2015-12-27T18:52:46","modified_gmt":"2015-12-27T23:52:46","slug":"correcting-with-cancel-slips","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sarahwerner.net\/blog\/2015\/04\/correcting-with-cancel-slips\/","title":{"rendered":"Correcting with cancel slips"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"correcting<\/a>
correcting 4 lines\u00a0(STC 25286<\/a>; sig. 1[8]r)<\/figcaption><\/figure>Thanks to my last post, when Mitch Fraas and I were looking at how different copies of the same book handled having a printer error (Judas instead of Jesus<\/a>, in that case), I’ve spent the last week with\u00a0cancel slips on my mind—those pieces of papers that are pasted in to correct printing mistakes. Once you start looking, you can find cancel slips in a huge range of uses and states. (And as long-time readers know, I’m always interested in printer’s mistakes<\/a> and how they can be corrected.)<\/p>\n

What do you do if you’ve misprinted one of three propositions central to the 1599 Westminster conference? You print the corrected third proposition and paste it over the error—cheaper than reprinting the whole sheet (the whole book is only two sheets long) and easier than pasting in a canceled leaf.<\/p>\n

Of course, for shorter errors, printers often included a list of errata—known mistakes in the book that users are invited to correct on their own. But what if your errata has errata? Paste in the correction, like the printer does for this 1660 Homer:\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"adding<\/a>
adding to the errata (157- 691q<\/a>; sig. e4v)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Augustine Vincent’s A discouerie of errours in the first edition of the catalogue of nobility<\/em> (1622) is itself, notoriously, riddled with errors and corrections. Some of the errors focus on the coats of arms that is a primary focus on his discourse, although as you can see below, it’s not always easy to notice the slips:<\/p>\n

\"on<\/a>
on the left, the cancel slip pasted over an incorrect coat of arms; in the middle, a detail showing the edge of the slip; on the right, the verso of the page showing the original printed image and the pasted-in overlay (STC 24755.8 copy 1<\/a>; sig. 2D2r and v)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Vincent’s work also includes slips over erroneous marginal notes:<\/p>\n

\"a<\/a>
a cancel sip over marginalia, subsequently removed on the left (STC 24755.8 copy 1<\/a>) and intact on the right (STC 24756 copy 1<\/a>); sig. 4O2v.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The book also includes, in some copies, corrections made by overprinting, rather than cancel slips; in this case, the corrected line is printed below the last line of the page (and on top of the old catchword):<\/p>\n

\"overprinting<\/a>
overprinting (STC 24756 copy 1<\/a>; sig. 4O3v)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Cancel slips can be used for smaller bits of text as well, as in this from Samuel Harsnett’s A declaration of egregious popish impostures<\/em> (1603):<\/p>\n

\"correcting<\/a>
correcting a word, or part of a word (STC 12880 copy 2<\/a> on the left, copy 1 on the right; sig. B1r)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Sometimes the correction is even smaller, as in this tiny slip in the title of this 1590 volume of Pomponius Mela’s works, changing “wohthy” to “worthy”:<\/p>\n

\"on<\/a>
on the left, the cancel slip for “r”; on the right, the verso of the leaf showing the original “h” (STC 17786<\/a>; sig. C1r)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

If you work with early printed books, you come across these slips all the time. Most of the time, readers skim over them; usually what we’re interested in when we’re reading a book is the corrected text, not the mistakes. But if you look at multiple copies of the same book, you can see the different ways these errors were treated.<\/p>\n

In Thomas James’s 1612 The Iesuits downefall<\/em>, one of the marginal dates was erroneously printed as July 10. In one of the Folger’s two copies, there is a printed cancel slip pasted over the error; in the other, the printed date has been carefully scraped away and the correct date handwritten in:<\/p>\n

\"printed<\/a>
printed and manuscript corrections (STC 14459 copy 1<\/a> on the left, copy 2 on the right; sig. *2r)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The Folger has five copies of William Painter’s The second tome \u00a0of the Palace of pleasures<\/i>, giving me\u00a0the opportunity to see a handful of examples of the same correction in different cancel slips—would they look the same? would we find anything interesting?\u00a0The first copy of the book doesn’t have the slip, but it does show why the text was in need of correction: the gap between the bottom of the left-hand page and the top of the right-hand page indicate that some text was omitted from the printing. It also looks, from the spotting on the bottom of the page, like the cancel slip was once present, but has since fallen off or been taken off.<\/p>\n

\"the<\/a>
the uncorrected state (STC 19125 copy 1<\/a>; sigs 2X6v-2X7r)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The second copy of the book is identified in Hamnet as having the slip cancel, but a closer look at the book shows that’s not quite right:<\/p>\n

\"part<\/a>
part of a cancel slip (STC 19125 copy 2<\/a>; sig. 2X6v)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Part of the slip is there, but someone at some point tried to remove it. They did a pretty good job of not damaging the book when they did it, and at first glance I wasn’t sure quite what was going on, but light shining through the leaf clearly indicates where the slip was torn away.<\/p>\n

\"STC19125copy2-detail-torn-slip-verso\"<\/a>
a torn-away slip (STC 19125 copy 2<\/a>; sig. 2X6r)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The third copy of the book leads to success, at last! The cancel slip is there, but there’s also something weird going on, as the marginalia below the slip suggests. In this copy, this gathering has been misbound, and so an early reader of the book included notes at the bottom of the leaves indicating which leaf was next.<\/p>\n

\"a<\/a>
a present cancel slip but a misbound gathering (STC 19125 copy 3<\/a>; sig. 2X6v)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

At last, the fourth copy shows us how the book would have looked once successfully corrected:<\/p>\n

\"the<\/a>
the complete cancel slip in the correct place (STC 19125 copy 4<\/a>; sig. 2X6v)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Oh, and the fifth copy? That one is missing these leaves altogether.<\/p>\n

One of the things that struck me, in looking through lots of books with cancel slips—many more than I’ve shown you here!—is that pages have topographical variety. I know you know that paper isn’t flat. But looking at cancel slips gave me another way of experiencing the landscape of book pages.<\/p>\n

\"the<\/a>
the edge of a slip (STC 19125 copy 4<\/a>; sig. 2X6v)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"a<\/a>
a worn cancel slip (G1509a bd.w. W1525<\/a>; t.p.)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"raised<\/a>
raised cancel slip on the left; impression on the right (STC 5080 copy 1<\/a>; sigs Q4v-Q5r)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\"a<\/a>
a lifted cancel slip in Chaucer’s Plowman’s Tale (STC 5080 copy 3<\/a>; sig. Q4v)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Thanks to my last post, when Mitch Fraas and I were looking at how different copies of the same book handled having a printer error (Judas instead of Jesus, in that case), I’ve spent the last week with\u00a0cancel slips on my mind—those pieces of papers that are pasted in to correct printing mistakes. Once you start looking, you can find cancel slips in a huge range of uses and states. (And as long-time readers know, I’m always interested in printer’s mistakes and how they can be corrected.) What do you do if you’ve misprinted one of three propositions central to the 1599 Westminster conference? You print the corrected third proposition and paste it over the error—cheaper than reprinting the whole sheet (the whole book is only two sheets long) and easier than pasting in a canceled leaf. Of course, for shorter errors, printers often included a list of errata—known mistakes…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[78],"tags":[13,12],"class_list":["post-9791","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-collation","tag-errors","tag-printing","post-archive"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sarahwerner.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9791","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sarahwerner.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sarahwerner.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sarahwerner.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sarahwerner.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9791"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/sarahwerner.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9791\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sarahwerner.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9791"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sarahwerner.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9791"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sarahwerner.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9791"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}