{"id":195,"date":"2010-10-08T15:04:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-08T15:04:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/wynkendeworde.wordpress.com\/2010\/10\/08\/more-thoughts-on-reading-e-books"},"modified":"2011-05-31T01:45:00","modified_gmt":"2011-05-31T01:45:00","slug":"more-thoughts-on-reading-e-books","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sarahwerner.net\/blog\/2010\/10\/more-thoughts-on-reading-e-books\/","title":{"rendered":"more thoughts on reading e-books"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As I&#8217;ve spent more time reading on my iPad, I&#8217;ve come to more  realizations about how I read. The most surprising thing is how much I  miss sharing books. This is more complicated than it sounds. I knew, of  course, that you can&#8217;t really share e-books, but I have never really  been someone who likes to share books. I&#8217;m happy to borrow books, but I  get nervous loaning mine out. They come back beat up, or they don&#8217;t come  back at all and then I resent the person who has my book, or I can&#8217;t  remember who I loaned it to and it&#8217;s gone forever. So I&#8217;m not a big book  sharer. And since my family shares a single Kindle account, my spouse  and my son and I can all share books across our devices&#8211;even better, we  can read that book simultaneously on our separate devices. But what I  failed to account for is the fact that I do actually loan out my books.  Not often, and not with very many people. But there are a couple of  friends I would like to be able to loan a book to, and sharing books  with my sister was one of the important ways that we stayed connected  with each other. I hadn&#8217;t even realized how much it mattered to me to be  able to exchange books with her until my Kindle reading got in the way.  We&#8217;re currently exploring sharing an account, since she and I have more  similar tastes in reading than my husband and I do. (The fact that the  Alpha Gadgeteer and I rarely enjoy the same books took me a long time to  adjust to&#8211;it can be hard, when reading is so important to you, to not  be able to share it with someone you love.) So sharing books with my  sister makes a lot of sense, especially as it&#8217;s a way of sharing our  bond with each other in a pleasurable way, when so many of our other  points of connection require more difficult emotions.<\/p>\n<p>So one of  the thing that I&#8217;ve rediscovered through reading on my iPad is that  reading can be strongly tied to social connections. We exchange books as  a way of saying, &#8220;I love you&#8221; or &#8220;I&#8217;m thinking of you&#8221; or any of a host  of other emotions that connect us to each other.<\/p>\n<p>Another thing  that I&#8217;ve rediscovered is that we each individually read different texts  in different ways. I had some sense of this in my post about <a href=\"http:\/\/wynkendeworde.blogspot.com\/2010\/07\/false-endings.html\">false  endings<\/a>, in which I commented that most of my e-book reading was of  thrillers, stories that pull me forward into their plot. But as I&#8217;ve  spent more time with this contraption, and as I&#8217;ve let my book-buying  habits expand, I&#8217;ve come to realize that there are some books I really  would prefer to read in paper codex form. Some of this has to do with  how I navigate the text: some works ask me to read them slowly, to  revisit earlier passages, to refer back to past points in the narrative.  Some works deserve to have a graphic presentation that reflects their  content, a font that was chosen deliberately for them, a paper stock  that makes up their heft, or their lack of it.<\/p>\n<p>The iPad has  worked fabulously well for me when I was reading Stieg Larsson&#8217;s trilogy  or Justin Cronin&#8217;s <em>The Passage<\/em>. In fact, it worked ideally. I didn&#8217;t  have to wait to make it to a bookstore to start reading the 2nd book  after I finished the 1st (something, of course, that was true only  because I didn&#8217;t start reading them until the entire series was out).  And I didn&#8217;t have to awkwardly hold the 700-plus pages of <em>The Passage<\/em> as  I sped through it. (And I was less likely to throw my iPad against the wall in my annoyance at the ending than I would have been with the book itself. I know it&#8217;s the first part of a trilogy, but sheesh!) And given that I do a lot of my reading at night, in  bed, with my glasses off and the font greatly enlarged, I do speed  through these books&#8211;there&#8217;s not room for lots of words on the screen  when you&#8217;re reading in a big font. You just read, click, read, click,  read, click. Any sense of physical movement through the book is greatly  diminished. And that&#8217;s fine. It worked with how I was experiencing those  books anyway. I was reading them to find out what happened next. I  cared about the characters and the language just enough to make me care  about the plot.<\/p>\n<p>But now I&#8217;m reading Howard Jacobson&#8217;s <em>The Finkler  Question<\/em>, and though I&#8217;m not very far into it, I&#8217;m finding that I  really wish I was reading it in book form. I haven&#8217;t been able to quite  put my finger on it (there&#8217;s an apt metaphor for you), but I need to  be able to sink further into it, to take my time with it, and reading  it on my iPad is somehow getting in the way of that.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s  possible this is less about the iPad and more about <em>The Finkler  Question<\/em>. After my father died, a few years ago, I lost the ability to  read any serious fiction. I was in the middle of reading <em>English, August<\/em> and it was a great book, but I put it down and couldn&#8217;t pick it back  up. Instead I picked up Tony Hillerman. And then I devoured a lot of P.  D. James, and I discovered Laura Lippman, and a whole lot of not very  good chick lit that I mostly don&#8217;t recall. This got better, slowly, and I  discovered that I could read <em>What is the What<\/em>, even though Philip Roth  was off limits. I loved <em>The Imperfectionists<\/em>. And I never lost the  ability to read some of my old favorites, like <em>Jane Eyre<\/em>. But I still  sometimes hit an unexpected wall when I&#8217;m reading. I know other people  who have had similar experiences, and I know that some people get back  to their old ways of reading, and I continue to hope that will be true  for me too.<\/p>\n<p>My point in sharing this is that we have different  ways of reading different books. I was fine reading novels about death.  But there was a category of books that felt like they asked too much of  me: I needed to commit to them, to enter into their world, to let them  take charge of me. And perhaps it was that I felt too unsettled in my  own world to do that, but I simply couldn&#8217;t read those books. I needed  to be able to stay on the surface of what I was reading.<\/p>\n<p>So  perhaps that&#8217;s what my problem is with <em>The Finkler Question<\/em>. It&#8217;s asking  too much of me, and I&#8217;m still not ready to read that way. But I think,  too, that the iPad has something to do with this. It&#8217;s very easy to race  through reading on the iPad. All texts look the same in the Kindle app,  and sometimes they start to blur together. Maybe I can retrain myself  to read more slowly even on my iPad, to take my time with the feel of  the language. I might still be able to rewire some of my perceptual  habits.<\/p>\n<p>But I don&#8217;t know that I will. I had an exchange with one  of my children that made me think that as much as I do love reading on  my iPad, I don&#8217;t love all types of reading on my iPad. I had bought  Philip Pullman&#8217;s <em>The Golden Compass<\/em> for my son, and have been really  pleased that he&#8217;s been enjoying it. (He and I often do share similar  tastes in reading, and to be able to share favorite books with your  child is even more lovely than to share them with your spouse.) But I  inadvertently ordered the mass market paperback for him, and the font is  fairly small, especially compared to the books normally printed for  kids to read. So although he&#8217;s enjoying the book, he was feeling a bit  frustrated with the print, and it seemed to me it was making the book a  bit harder than it needed to be. He&#8217;s enjoyed reading books on our  Kindle before, so I bought the Kindle edition of <em>The Golden  Compass<\/em>&#8211;less than $8 and then I can read it on my iPad along with him!  But he soon decided that he preferred reading it as a book. Yes, the  type was bigger on the Kindle, and yes, he&#8217;d enjoyed reading some Rick  Riordan books on it. But this time it wasn&#8217;t working for him. It felt  better as a book. I think he felt similar to how I feel about <em>The  Finkler Question<\/em>. Some books you need to focus on, and you need to do  that in book form.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As I&#8217;ve spent more time reading on my iPad, I&#8217;ve come to more realizations about how I read. The most surprising thing is how much I miss sharing books. This is more complicated than it sounds. I knew, of course, that you can&#8217;t really share e-books, but I have never really been someone who likes to share books. I&#8217;m happy to borrow books, but I get nervous loaning mine out. They come back beat up, or they don&#8217;t come back at all and then I resent the person who has my book, or I can&#8217;t remember who I loaned it to and it&#8217;s gone forever. So I&#8217;m not a big book sharer. And since my family shares a single Kindle account, my spouse and my son and I can all share books across our devices&#8211;even better, we can read that book simultaneously on our separate devices. But what I failed&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[15,18],"class_list":["post-195","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-wynken","tag-ebooks","tag-reading","post-archive"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sarahwerner.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sarahwerner.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sarahwerner.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sarahwerner.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sarahwerner.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=195"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/sarahwerner.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/195\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sarahwerner.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=195"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sarahwerner.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=195"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sarahwerner.net\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=195"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}